The scene from The
Wizard of Oz my subconscious most often references is when Dorothy & Co. awake as snow falls to counteract the
effects of the Wicked Witch’s poisonous poppies. Like the travelers, I hear little voices singing, “You’re
out of the woods, you’re out of the dark, you’re out of the night.”
The MOOC MOOC is coming to a close, and the earworm chorus of high-pitched, optimistic voices is firmly in place. The experience
was interesting, stimulating, and even exciting, and I think I “learned” a
great deal. But it was an intense experience that might have been even more so had I only the MOOC MOOC to think about.
As I emerge from the thickets of the MOOC MOOC, it’s pretty clear that my learning was not about “how to teach a Massive
Open Online Course,” although I guess I could tease that content out of the
experience and materials that were modeled for us. Nor was it, at least for me,
about whether MOOCs are good or bad: Are MOOCs the future of education or merely an
interesting experiment that captures the technology and anxieties of our moment
in an interesting and probably fruitful way? Probably somewhere in between.
What I did learn, as I see things in this early stage of digesting the MOOC
MOOC experience, is what MOOCs are and what the learner experience can be like. I think
I also learned what MOOCs can be and what they can do. I learned that there are passionate believers
in the cMOOC (Connectivist)
approach and those who disdain the more common so-called (at least within the MOOC MOOC world) xMOOC (giant online academic course with familiar trappings) model.
I learned that there are plenty of folks ready to jump on the “all of education
as we know it is a crime against learners” bandwagon and a bunch of people with
healthy skepticism about education that is too massive in scale and too online
in nature—people who prefer face-to-face interaction and the yeastiness and warmth of
real-time, viva voce communication. I
learned that a Twitter feed rolling at the pace of the odometer of the Starship
Enterprise is on the ragged edge
between representing a helpful hashtag PLN and just making me want to close the laptop
and go for a walk; just way TMI—and I don’t mean Three-Mile Island.
Where will I go with my learning? Well, I feel relatively
confident about injecting myself into conversations about large-scale online
learning, and I can speak with at least the knowledge of experience about yet
another LMS (in this case Instructure Canvas, tidy and flexible from what I
could see as a consumer) and a few more online tools. I believe that I could
put a course together in either the “participant pedagogy”/Connectivist milieu
or the more conventional mode; I am feeling vaguely empowered to contribute to
one of the potential MOOC experiences presenting itself in the independent
school world, Fred Bartels’s planning document for a MOOC on “IndependentSchools and Information Technology.” (Soon to be upgraded, I read; Fred has been a fellow participant in the MOOC MOOC and is generating a few more ideas on this evan as I write this.)
I think I will also incorporate the word “connectivist” into
my vocabulary, although I may not prove to be as rigorous or doctrinaire a
Connectivist as some of the MOOC MOOC organizers. I like the term in its
insistence on the idea that knowledge and information exist by and for
collaboration and that education is as much or more about connecting—people and
ideas—as it is about, say, constructing understandings or the transmission of
expert knowledge. I’m not sure yet that Connectivist learning leaves
Constructivism entirely in the dust, nor am I convinced that there are not places where
expert knowledge can be helpful to an enterprise, even a learning enterprise.
You may not love Khan Academy, but if you need a quick tutorial in solving for x, it’s easy one-stop shopping.
What’s next? I still have to complete the
Edutopia-IDEO-Riverdale Design Thinking MOOC,
which I observe to be becoming a bit less M
as time goes on: the first exercise on Week One generated 35 pages of content,
while the Week Three exercises just winding down have yielded considerably
fewer. The try it-post-respond model
seems a bit too familiar, and I find myself a bit prickly over their insistence
(it’s a “rule” of brainstorming there, for instance) that I “be visual.” I do
my best, but somehow I’ve gotten out of the habit of drawing little pictures to
illustrate my ideas. My spouse and kids would tell me I need play more
Pictionary or Draw Something. Anyhow, I’ve got two more weeks to access my
inner sketch artist.
Am I glad I participated in the MOOC MOOC? Yes, very. Will
it have a lasting effect on my thinking? I suspect so. These are
the questions that matter to me at the moment, and I am satisfied with my
answers. If Hybrid Pedagogy rolls out a
similar venture in the future, I would recommend it. (Speaking of which, I am
enormously appreciative of the thought and energy that the organizers put into
the MOOC MOOC—it was a tour de force in every way.)
And I’m signed up for a Coursera course that begins in fall. Time to experience the full force of a
college-taught xMOOC.
I share many of your reactions and agree with points, except perhaps about how "connectivist" the organizers are (as yet more interest and inclination).
ReplyDeleteSome of our reactions may be generational too. I need more digestion time and a nap before processing, let alone putting down on paper. For the sake of the schedule's headlong pace, I may try to get something down and posted today (hey, I still haven't done one for Change 11)
More slow learning please ... Caution! Slow Learning Lane...
Which Coursera did you sign up for? I am in Fantasy and SF, taking a look at (lurking) Internet History but not participating and signed up for Modern Poetry
PS adding blog to reader
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteMy Coursera will be a baby-steps course in programming--haven't done any at all in 30 years and nothing "serious" since 1969, but I'm hoping my vestigial memories will get me going.
DeleteBTW, please let me know if your Fantasy and SF course gets into the topic of fandoms--one of my kids has a serious academic interest and has (not surprisingly) found little scholarship on his area of interest, which is fan writing as text and not fandom as sociology.